From 475c11b1a7699e63467c0182da3602fbe6222378 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marius Bakke Date: Wed, 9 May 2018 15:37:16 +0200 Subject: gnu: jemalloc: Update to 5.1.0. * gnu/packages/jemalloc.scm (jemalloc): Update to 5.1.0. [source](patches): Remove. * gnu/packages/patches/jemalloc-arm-address-bits.patch: Delete file. * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Remove it. --- gnu/local.mk | 1 - gnu/packages/jemalloc.scm | 5 ++- .../patches/jemalloc-arm-address-bits.patch | 39 ---------------------- 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 gnu/packages/patches/jemalloc-arm-address-bits.patch (limited to 'gnu') diff --git a/gnu/local.mk b/gnu/local.mk index 4fa88e300d..72de5f20b0 100644 --- a/gnu/local.mk +++ b/gnu/local.mk @@ -802,7 +802,6 @@ dist_patch_DATA = \ %D%/packages/patches/java-xerces-bootclasspath.patch \ %D%/packages/patches/java-xerces-build_dont_unzip.patch \ %D%/packages/patches/java-xerces-xjavac_taskdef.patch \ - %D%/packages/patches/jemalloc-arm-address-bits.patch \ %D%/packages/patches/jbig2dec-ignore-testtest.patch \ %D%/packages/patches/json-glib-fix-tests-32bit.patch \ %D%/packages/patches/jq-CVE-2015-8863.patch \ diff --git a/gnu/packages/jemalloc.scm b/gnu/packages/jemalloc.scm index 5086df7a1b..cb870208e4 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/jemalloc.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/jemalloc.scm @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ (define-public jemalloc (package (name "jemalloc") - (version "5.0.1") + (version "5.1.0") (source (origin (method url-fetch) (uri (string-append @@ -40,8 +40,7 @@ version "/jemalloc-" version ".tar.bz2")) (sha256 (base32 - "1sf3lzgb0y8nnyzmp4zrca3sngdxw3kfh20sna9z03jv74fph528")) - (patches (search-patches "jemalloc-arm-address-bits.patch")))) + "0s3jpcyhzia8d4k0xyc67is78kg416p9yc3c2f9w6fhhqqffd5jk")))) (build-system gnu-build-system) (arguments `(#:phases diff --git a/gnu/packages/patches/jemalloc-arm-address-bits.patch b/gnu/packages/patches/jemalloc-arm-address-bits.patch deleted file mode 100644 index f2ef24c25a..0000000000 --- a/gnu/packages/patches/jemalloc-arm-address-bits.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,39 +0,0 @@ -From 8cfc9dec37b312a2686f602bbcdd102ca07cca99 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: David Goldblatt -Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 13:54:08 -0700 -Subject: [PATCH] ARM: Don't extend bit LG_VADDR to compute high address bits. - -In userspace ARM on Linux, zero-ing the high bits is the correct way to do this. -This doesn't fix the fact that we currently set LG_VADDR to 48 on ARM, when in -fact larger virtual address sizes are coming soon. We'll cross that bridge when -we come to it. ---- - include/jemalloc/internal/rtree.h | 12 ++++++++++++ - 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) - -diff --git a/include/jemalloc/internal/rtree.h b/include/jemalloc/internal/rtree.h -index b5d4db39..4563db23 100644 ---- a/include/jemalloc/internal/rtree.h -+++ b/include/jemalloc/internal/rtree.h -@@ -178,9 +178,21 @@ rtree_leaf_elm_bits_read(tsdn_t *tsdn, rtree_t *rtree, rtree_leaf_elm_t *elm, - - JEMALLOC_ALWAYS_INLINE extent_t * - rtree_leaf_elm_bits_extent_get(uintptr_t bits) { -+# ifdef __aarch64__ -+ /* -+ * aarch64 doesn't sign extend the highest virtual address bit to set -+ * the higher ones. Instead, the high bits gets zeroed. -+ */ -+ uintptr_t high_bit_mask = ((uintptr_t)1 << LG_VADDR) - 1; -+ /* Mask off the slab bit. */ -+ uintptr_t low_bit_mask = ~(uintptr_t)1; -+ uintptr_t mask = high_bit_mask & low_bit_mask; -+ return (extent_t *)(bits & mask); -+# else - /* Restore sign-extended high bits, mask slab bit. */ - return (extent_t *)((uintptr_t)((intptr_t)(bits << RTREE_NHIB) >> - RTREE_NHIB) & ~((uintptr_t)0x1)); -+# endif - } - - JEMALLOC_ALWAYS_INLINE szind_t -- cgit v1.2.3