From 6d1a5e5ffdbb7d15ffad7918213d96ee8c6e9164 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ludovic Courtès Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 15:51:47 +0200 Subject: refresh: Report packages using the "@" syntax. * guix/scripts/refresh.scm (list-dependents)[full-name]: New procedure. Use 'full-name' instead of 'package-full-name'. * doc/guix.texi (Invoking guix refresh): Adjust example accordingly. --- doc/guix.texi | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'doc/guix.texi') diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi index 957ce2bab3..9f63413bbf 100644 --- a/doc/guix.texi +++ b/doc/guix.texi @@ -5852,7 +5852,7 @@ an upgrade. More rebuilds might be required under some circumstances. @example $ guix refresh --list-dependent flex Building the following 120 packages would ensure 213 dependent packages are rebuilt: -hop-2.4.0 geiser-0.4 notmuch-0.18 mu-0.9.9.5 cflow-1.4 idutils-4.6 @dots{} +hop@@2.4.0 geiser@@0.4 notmuch@@0.18 mu@@0.9.9.5 cflow@@1.4 idutils@@4.6 @dots{} @end example The command above lists a set of packages that could be built to check -- cgit v1.2.3