From bfb3c3d03a168002d77631a653457556a96d9bdd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ludovic Courtès Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 15:30:08 +0200 Subject: build: Move `distro/patches' to `distro/packages/patches'. * distro/patches: Move directory to... * distro/packages/patches: ... here. * Makefile.am (dist_patch_DATA): Adjust accordingly. * pre-inst-env.in (DISTRO_PATCH_DIRECTORY): Likewise. --- .../patches/diffutils-gets-undeclared.patch | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+) create mode 100644 distro/packages/patches/diffutils-gets-undeclared.patch (limited to 'distro/packages/patches/diffutils-gets-undeclared.patch') diff --git a/distro/packages/patches/diffutils-gets-undeclared.patch b/distro/packages/patches/diffutils-gets-undeclared.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..b6cdc77caa --- /dev/null +++ b/distro/packages/patches/diffutils-gets-undeclared.patch @@ -0,0 +1,71 @@ +This patch is needed to allow builds with newer versions of +the GNU libc (2.16+). + + +commit 66712c23388e93e5c518ebc8515140fa0c807348 +Author: Eric Blake +Date: Thu Mar 29 13:30:41 2012 -0600 + + stdio: don't assume gets any more + + Gnulib intentionally does not have a gets module, and now that C11 + and glibc have dropped it, we should be more proactive about warning + any user on a platform that still has a declaration of this dangerous + interface. + + * m4/stdio_h.m4 (gl_STDIO_H, gl_STDIO_H_DEFAULTS): Drop gets + support. + * modules/stdio (Makefile.am): Likewise. + * lib/stdio-read.c (gets): Likewise. + * tests/test-stdio-c++.cc: Likewise. + * m4/warn-on-use.m4 (gl_WARN_ON_USE_PREPARE): Fix comment. + * lib/stdio.in.h (gets): Make warning occur in more places. + * doc/posix-functions/gets.texi (gets): Update documentation. + Reported by Christer Solskogen. + + Signed-off-by: Eric Blake + +diff --git a/lib/stdio.in.h b/lib/stdio.in.h +index aa7b599..c377b6e 100644 +--- a/lib/stdio.in.h ++++ b/lib/stdio.in.h +@@ -698,22 +698,11 @@ _GL_WARN_ON_USE (getline, "getline is unportable - " + # endif + #endif + +-#if @GNULIB_GETS@ +-# if @REPLACE_STDIO_READ_FUNCS@ && @GNULIB_STDIO_H_NONBLOCKING@ +-# if !(defined __cplusplus && defined GNULIB_NAMESPACE) +-# undef gets +-# define gets rpl_gets +-# endif +-_GL_FUNCDECL_RPL (gets, char *, (char *s) _GL_ARG_NONNULL ((1))); +-_GL_CXXALIAS_RPL (gets, char *, (char *s)); +-# else +-_GL_CXXALIAS_SYS (gets, char *, (char *s)); +-# undef gets +-# endif +-_GL_CXXALIASWARN (gets); + /* It is very rare that the developer ever has full control of stdin, +- so any use of gets warrants an unconditional warning. Assume it is +- always declared, since it is required by C89. */ ++ so any use of gets warrants an unconditional warning; besides, C11 ++ removed it. */ ++#undef gets ++#if HAVE_RAW_DECL_GETS + _GL_WARN_ON_USE (gets, "gets is a security hole - use fgets instead"); + #endif + +@@ -1053,9 +1042,9 @@ _GL_WARN_ON_USE (snprintf, "snprintf is unportable - " + # endif + #endif + +-/* Some people would argue that sprintf should be handled like gets +- (for example, OpenBSD issues a link warning for both functions), +- since both can cause security holes due to buffer overruns. ++/* Some people would argue that all sprintf uses should be warned about ++ (for example, OpenBSD issues a link warning for it), ++ since it can cause security holes due to buffer overruns. + However, we believe that sprintf can be used safely, and is more + efficient than snprintf in those safe cases; and as proof of our + belief, we use sprintf in several gnulib modules. So this header -- cgit v1.2.3